The helicopter has been with us for many years, since the first commercially viable production model in 1936. Their ability to hover, take off and land vertically, and operate at low speeds has carved out a niche for helicopters for decades. However, their dominance over the vertical aircraft airspace may be in doubt as a new paradigm emerges; that of the Quadrotor.

The quadrotor is similar to a helicopter like a bicycle is to a car. Instead of two opposed rotors the quadrotor has 4, mounted symmetrically on the body of the vehicle. This gives the quadrotor far greater control when in the air. A helicopter changes its angle of attack from the main rotor in an ungainly fashion, a quadrotor merely has to trim speed/torque from one of its rotors to accomplish the same effect. In case you were wondering how both vehicles control their various control surfaces, actuators are once again the answer, with linear actuators providing several essential motive forces in fully scaled up helicopters.

But just how good are these quadrotors? Helicopters have ruled the roost for decades, surely it’ll take more than a shoe box with rotors on each corner to retire them! To see them in action check out some of these videos:

This video demonstrates the far greater control possible with the quadrotor’s four engined design, which in turn leads to its programmability. Early in the video you see one do three vertical flips(!), and near the end a swarm of the quadrotors fly in an intersecting figure eight pattern. Since there are far fewer variables involved in controlling a quadrotor (as opposed to a helicopter) programmable, computer controlled flight suddenly seems a realistic possibility.

That last video was kind of ominous, let’s end this with another video of quadrotors playing music instead:

Of course, these quadrotors are all quite small. One could argue that helicopters are in no danger when these quadrotors are barely larger than sparrows. The idea is gaining traction though, and some full size vehicles using the same concepts already exist. For example there’s the Bell Boeing V-22 Osprey, a two rotored vehicle already in military service. More exciting, Bell Helicopter and Boeing are also working on a 4 rotored version: The Bell Boeing Quad TiltRotor.

Posted in Technology | Leave a comment

NORTH CAROLINA – The progress of robotics marches on, with automotive factories, aeronautics engineering, and outer space applications investing millions of dollars to push the envelope. But maybe there’s another way; enterprising Engineering Student Max Shepherd (maxshepherd.net) has made an advanced robot arm and shoulder assembly out of Lego Mindstorm parts, readily available directly off-the-shelf.

Powered by an air compressor, this arm demonstrates an amazing range of motion in all joints. The Lego parts aren’t up to riveting cars and airplane wings just yet (maximum lift capacity is only a few pounds) but this is still an example of a ‘good old engineering’ triumph. Check out the arm in action:

Compare and contrast this with our last article, about a Hockey Playing Robot. The breakthrough there was in terms of software programming. Unfortunately for us all, software-driven robotic arm and hand movements are not a ‘solved’ problem, and Mr. Shepherd’s creation is manually controlled by a series of joysticks and switches.

Posted in Robotics | Leave a comment

MANITOBA -In a particularly Canadian display of ingenuity students from the University of Manitoba robotics department have created a hockey-playing robot, based on the DarwinOP hardware/software platform. The robot, named Jennifer after storied Canadian Women’s hockey player Jennifer Botterill, stands just under two feet tall, teetering precariously on foot pods modified to accommodate skate blades. Sport playing robots are not a new phenomenon, seeing as the Soccer RoboCup is now in its fifteenth year. The triumph for the Canadian students lay in the programming of the ‘skating’ behaviour, as well as the ‘puck-handling’ ability. The skating currently is an abbreviated form of tottering walk, but the lessons learned here may help future programmers in dealing with difficult or slippery terrain for their own robots.

The DarwinOD platform is a popular choice for robotics enthusiasts who want to tackle the software engineering problems behind robotic locomotion and behaviour rather than the physical challenges of structural design. Developed by Korean company ROBOTIS, and costing a mere $12,000 this platform has rapidly become ‘go to’ for robot software and behavior researchers.

To see Jennifer pry a puck out of a tough corner, lay a hit and then score with a slapper watch this video:

 

While the robot is not about to win any hardest shot competitions in a while, it’s an interesting segue from the normal robotics projects such as soccer, arm-wrestling, and so on. Can Jai Alai be that far behind?

Posted in Robotics | Tagged | Leave a comment


Copyright 2010 Progressive Automations | All rights reserved